"Godsend" was
originally supposed to come out in October 2003, but was pushed back
to April 2004 when re-shoots had to take place. Usually, that’s bad news in
terms of a movie being top-notch and unfortunately, this was one of those
sour times. I personally have a rule that I abide by when writing a
screenplay: I always know my ending beforehand. Why? Well, how am I
supposed to get anywhere if I don’t know what my final destination is?
Now I’m not saying that’s the only way to go about it, but it’s my
process and it makes sense to me. In this film's case, it sure felt like
it was pulling a “Mr. Magoo” as to where it was going. I
found this quote from the director that might explain a few things:
“It
doesn't make the movie worse or better because you shot a bunch of
different endings over a period of time as you were cutting it. We never
really shot a good ending while I was shooting the picture; I knew there
was something wrong and we needed to find one."
I beg to differ there, champ. I'm actually quite sure that lacking a clear ending
before the shoot most likely influenced the end result here-- which was a
redundant and aimless exercise in missed opportunities. That said, "Godsend" was
not an atrociously bad movie...it was just a frequently bland one; think a
lazy TV movie of the week. It sadly all started off on the right cell
splice with the narrative raising the potent theme of death and the always
fascinating question of “what if we could get around it?” For a split
second, the fine "Pet Semetary" came to mind in its setup, but once the deed
was done and Adam (Adam and Eve…get it?) was reborn, that was that on
that. All the best, love and kisses.
This
spectacle went on to swiftly hit the redundant and vacuous avenue. The
bulk of the narrative basically consisted of a string of “visions”
that the kid kept having. Problem was, the “apparitions” rarely raised
the stakes of the game throughout and went on to serve up an obvious, poor
man’s “mystery” that I solved 40 minutes in with my eyes closed. The last block of the picture didn’t fare much
better, with
scrawny plot turns forcing the story as to where it had to go and
an extended expositional monologue from some left field character (think
Oracle from the Matrix flicks) standing
in as a satisfying reason for the madness. Man, did that “let me spell it
out for ya, dumbo” scene stick out like a sore sailor! Don’t tell me
about it in an endless ramble man! This isn’t the stage! SHOW ME BITCH!
How lame and sluggish was that? And to make matters worse, the
ending that they wound up using was easily one of the most unsatisfying,
half-assed and puny cap-offs that I’ve seen in a film all year. It felt like they gave up on finding a way to conclude it all, so
they slapped in a cheap boo scare and offered up ZERO closure. Maybe
there’s something to be said about having an ending in your script
before shooting begins...or maybe I’m just an a-hole...
On
the erect side of the membrane, for all of its mediocrity in terms of
content, "Godsend" was still a mostly painless watch due to the fine acting
in the house. Kinnear and Romijn were easy love birds to get attached to
and follow around. They were the main reason as to why I stayed semi-interested in the film all the way through. Robert De Niro was also highly
amusing with his “meat and potatoes” performance while the kid
(Bright) looked spooky enough to work within the odd circumstance. Coating
wise, the somber score hit the spot, giving scenes impact when
substance failed while the stylish/atmospheric visuals were, at times, quite
effective in their eerie demeanor. I
loved Hamm’s style!
All
in all, it’s too bad that somebody forgot to take the kool premise that
is the cloning of a dead kid far enough for it to be able to stand on its
own two Nike’s as a fully fleshed-out movie. This could’ve been
something special as opposed to just another “see it and forget it”
effort that your parents will most likely love. Thank Zeus all mighty for
great casting! CLONE THIS!